So, everyone has heard about Mike Gillis' unhappiness about the officiating. He said, the officiating in Games 1 and 2 were even and it has been favouring Chicago, so I went back and looked up boxscore for Games 4, 5 and 6.
I am just looking at the following quote:
The penalties are mostly called in the 3rd period, and as can be seen, the score is already 5-1 in favour of Chicago, and you can say the Vancouver is just looking to "send a message" to the Chicago players. In the first two periods the penalties pretty much even out. In the third period the count of penalties called against is 11 - 7 in favour of Vancouver. I will list out the penalties which were not co-incidental, or were not cancelled out in the third period below:
I am just looking at the following quote:
“These are facts. They’re undeniable. The first two games everything is relatively equal, last four games they haven’t been. And when people seem to think we don’t have the killer instinct, it’s pretty tough to have the killer instinct when you’re killing penalties most of the time. And when your team is not getting power plays — our power play was No. 1 in the league — theoretically we felt there were six or seven legitimate calls (infractions) that weren’t called for whatever reason. That’s six or seven power-play opportunities for us. It’s going to change the outcome of the game.”
Read more: http://www.vancouversun.com/sports/Mike+Gillis+unplugged/4672665/story.html#ixzz1KaWSwVHx
![]() |
| Game 4 Scoring Summary |
![]() |
| Game 4 Penalty Summary |
Vancouver
- M. Lapierre's boarding at 2:14
- T.Glass' roughing at 4:05
- V.Oreskovich's ten minute misconduct at 7:58
- A.Edler charging at 13:09
- M.Lapierre's unsportsmanlike conduct at 19:23
Chicago
- N.Hjalmersson roughing at 16:20
- R.Johnson roughing at 17:56
Keeping the score in mind, as well as that the Vancouver players were running around trying to send a message. As a reader, I will let you decide.
Game 5, this game had ONE extra penalty in the first period which was called against Vancouver. From the looks of it, the game was fairly reffed.
Game 6 penalties, the count of total penalties against were 6 to 3 in favour of Chicago, the three more penalties are as follows:
![]() |
| Game 5 Scoring Summary |
![]() |
| Game 5 Penalty Summary |
![]() |
| Game 6 Scoring Summary |
![]() |
| Game 6 Penalty Summary |
- M.Raymond 2 mins for hooking at 10:07
- C.Hodgson 2 mins for putting puck over glass at 17:22.
- K.Bieksa 2 mins for tripping at 2:31, which resulted in the penalty shot.
The only penalty here you can argue is, the 2 mins hooking call on M.Raymond, that too you can't argue about that penalty until you review the play. As per the new rules, the puck went over the glass and the refs have no choice but to call a penalty on the play. About that tripping call on M.Frolik on the breakaway, can be seen in the Youtube video below.
He clearly had couple of steps on the defenceman, and he clearly had some steps on the closest defenceman. I have heard arguments about M.Frolik slowing down and stepping on the stick to fall down, whatever the case maybe, in my opinion it was a good call.
Now lets talk about the hit on Bryan Bickell on Kevin Bieksa. The video of the hit is below:
That was the best copy I could find of the hit. This hit IS a shoulder to the head, and it clearly is a hit that is banned but as per NHL those hits are allowed behind the night, as all the hits are considered north-south. We found this out when Raffi Torres' hit Brent Seabrook.
So, I will leave it upto you to discuss the merit of Vancouver's GM Mike Gillis' arguments, about MORE penalties being called on Vancouver than on Chicago.
Until next time,
Cheers!
Now lets talk about the hit on Bryan Bickell on Kevin Bieksa. The video of the hit is below:
That was the best copy I could find of the hit. This hit IS a shoulder to the head, and it clearly is a hit that is banned but as per NHL those hits are allowed behind the night, as all the hits are considered north-south. We found this out when Raffi Torres' hit Brent Seabrook.
So, I will leave it upto you to discuss the merit of Vancouver's GM Mike Gillis' arguments, about MORE penalties being called on Vancouver than on Chicago.
Until next time,
Cheers!
Thanks to Yahoo! Sports from which I got the scoring and penalty summaries.






